The Impact of Telemedicine on Rheumatology Care.

Background: The pandemic disrupted the care of patients with rheumatic diseases; difficulties in access to care and its psychological impact affected quality of life. Telemedicine as an alternative to traditional face-to-face office visits has the potential to mitigate this impact. Objective: To evaluate patient and provider experience with telemedicine and its effect on care. Methods: We surveyed patients with rheumatic diseases and their rheumatology providers. The surveys were conducted in 2020 and repeated in 2021. We assessed data on quality of care and health-related quality of life. Results: Hundred patients and 17 providers responded to the survey. Patients reported higher satisfaction with telemedicine in 2021 compared to 2020 (94 vs. 84%), felt more comfortable with (96 vs. 86%), expressed a stronger preference for (22 vs. 16%), and higher intention to use telemedicine in the future (83 vs. 77%); patients thought physicians were able to address their concerns. While providers' satisfaction with telemedicine increased (18-76%), 14/17 providers believed that telemedicine visits were worse than in-person visits. There were no differences in annualized office visits and admissions. Mean EQ-5D score was 0.74, lower than general population (0.87) but equivalent to a subset of patients with SLE (0.74). Conclusion: Our data showed a high level of satisfaction with telemedicine. The lower rheumatology provider satisfaction raises concern if telemedicine constitutes an acceptable alternative to in-person care. The stable number of office visits, admissions, and the similar quality of life to pre-pandemic level suggest effective management of rheumatic diseases using telemedicine/in-person hybrid care.

Glycan-mediated molecular interactions in bacterial pathogenesis.

Glycans are expressed on the surface of nearly all host and bacterial cells. Not surprisingly, glycan-mediated molecular interactions play a vital role in bacterial pathogenesis and host responses against pathogens. Glycan-mediated host-pathogen interactions can benefit the pathogen, host, or both. Here, we discuss (i) bacterial glycans that play a critical role in bacterial colonization and/or immune evasion, (ii) host glycans that are utilized by bacteria for pathogenesis, and (iii) bacterial and host glycans involved in immune responses against pathogens. We further discuss (iv) opportunities and challenges for transforming these research findings into more effective antibacterial strategies, and (v) technological advances in glycoscience that have helped to accelerate progress in research. These studies collectively offer valuable insights into new perspectives on antibacterial strategies that may effectively tackle the drug-resistant pathogens that are rapidly spreading globally.

The Use of COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients with SLE.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Three COVID-19 vaccines obtained emergency authorization from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and are widely used in the USA. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of evidence on the safety and efficacy of these vaccines in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD), as these patients were excluded from all phases of vaccine development. Here we reviewed current data on COVID-19 vaccination in patients with AIIRD, with emphasis on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and provided a comprehensive update on the benefits and risks of vaccination. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with SLE have worse immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination than healthy controls. The efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines seems to be further reduced by immunosuppressive medications, such as glucocorticoids (GC), methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate/mycophenolic acid (MMF), and rituximab (RTX). However, these data do not substantiate that AIIRD patients are at greater risk of disease flares or have a higher incidence of side effects following vaccination. There is no significant safety concern for the use of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with AIIRD. The benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks in patients with AIIRD, including SLE. More data are needed to determine the necessity of a booster vaccine dose and appropriate adjustment of immunosuppressants around the administration of vaccine.

The Role of IgG Subclass in Antibody-Mediated Protection against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have the potential to assist in the battle against multidrug-resistant bacteria such as carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-Kp). However, the characteristics by which these antibodies (Abs) function, such as the role of antibody subclass, must be determined before such modalities can be carried from the bench to the bedside. We performed a subclass switch on anticapsular monoclonal murine IgG3 (mIgG3) hybridomas and identified and purified a murine IgG1 (mIgG1) hybridoma line through sib selection. We then compared the ability of the mIgG1 and mIgG3 antibodies to control CR-Kp sequence type 258 (ST258) infection both in vitro and in vivo We found by enzyme-limited immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry that mIgG3 has superior binding to the CR-Kp capsular polysaccharide (CPS) and superior agglutinating ability compared to mIgG1 The mIgG3 also, predictably, had better complement-mediated serum bactericidal activity than the mIgG1 and also promoted neutrophil-mediated killing at concentrations lower than that of the mIgG1 In contrast, the mIgG1 had marginally better activity in improving macrophage-mediated phagocytosis. Comparing their activities in a pulmonary infection model with wild-type as well as neutropenic mice, both antibodies reduced organ burden in a nonlethal challenge, regardless of neutrophil status, with mIgG1 having the highest overall burden reduction in both scenarios. However, at a lethal inoculum, both antibodies showed reduced efficacy in neutropenic mice, with mIgG3 retaining the most activity. These findings suggest the viability of monoclonal Ab adjunctive therapy in neutropenic patients that cannot mount their own immune response, while also providing some insight into the relative contributions of immune mediators in CR-Kp protection.IMPORTANCE Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is an urgent public health threat that causes life-threatening infections in immunocompromised hosts. Its resistance to nearly all antibiotics necessitates novel strategies to treat it, including the use of monoclonal antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies are emerging as important adjuncts to traditional pharmaceuticals, and studying how they protect against specific bacteria such as Klebsiella pneumoniae is crucial to their development as effective therapies. Antibody subclass is often overlooked but is a major factor in how an antibody interacts with other mediators of immunity. This paper is the first to examine how the subclass of anticapsular monoclonal antibodies can affect efficacy against CR-Kp Additionally, this work sheds light on the viability of monoclonal antibody therapy in neutropenic patients, who are most vulnerable to CR-Kp infection.